Ethics | ||
---|---|---|
Topic Weight | Number of Questions | |
Level 1 | 15-20% | ca. 28 |
Level 2 | 10-15% | 8-12 |
Even though there are no formulae to memorize in the Ethics readings, it’s consistently regarded as one of the more difficult CFA topics due to the questions' subjectivity and the material's complexity. Aside from its importance throughout each level of the CFA, Ethics is unique for the ethics adjustment implemented by CFA Institute (CFAI). If you are on the edge of failing, a strong Ethics score may warrant a pass.
What to Expect in CFA Level 1 Ethics
CFA Level 1 Ethics is the most heavily weighted topic on the exam at 15-20%. The topic introduces CFAI’s 6 Codes of Ethics and 7 Standards of Professional Conduct (the Code and Standards). You must use these Codes and Standards as a framework for ethical decision-making throughout your financial career. While there are no formulae to memorize, Ethics is commonly regarded as one of the most challenging CFA Level 1 topics due to its breadth of material and relatively subjective nature. The topic material closes with a short introduction to Global Investment Standards (GIPS). Some of this material is optional.
Exam Weighting
The CFA Ethics topic has an exam weighting of 15-20%, meaning that approximately 27-36 of the 180 CFA Level 1 exam questions focus on this topic.
No. of Learning Modules | No. of Formulas |
---|---|
5 | 0 |
Level 1 Ethics 2025 Syllabus, Readings, and Changes
CFA Level 1 exam has not seen much fluctuation with the ethics portion since last year. The minimal changes include merging 2 or more readings (now called learning modules) leading to lesser learning outcome statements (LOS) this year.
No. of Learning Modules – 5 | No. of LOS – 21 | |
---|---|---|
Summary
Introduces the CFAI® Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct and how to apply such standards to particular situations. Concludes with an overview of the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS).
|
Ethics and Trust in the Investment Profession
Financial analysis is about more than formulae and forecasting. Financial markets and businesses could not function without trust in individuals and institutions. This reading introduces the concept of investing as a profession and the importance of ethical behavior in investing. You will learn to create trust through maintaining standards, abiding by codes, and applying an ethical framework to your daily professional decisions.
Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct
Students often struggle with Ethics because it relies more on subjectivity and intuition than formulae. However, the Standards of Practice Handbook makes the theoretical side of Ethics more concrete by providing guidance on common ethical dilemmas that investment professionals face on a daily basis.
This reading describes the importance of building a positive community of reputable investment professionals who strive to meet and surpass industry expectations. You will learn that Ethics is not just about an individual’s good choices but the aggregate of ethical decisions made by a community of members.
“Through members’ and candidates’ adherence to these principles as a whole, the integrity of and trust in the capital markets are improved.”
Guidance for Standards I-VII
You are expected to understand how to apply the Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct to real-world situations that they may face as professional financial analysts.
Guidance for Standards is broken down into 7 general sections, each with its own subcategories:
- Professionalism
- Integrity of Capital Markets
- Duties to Clients
- Duties to Employers
- Investment Analysis, Recommendations, and Actions
- Conflict of Interest
- Responsibilities as a CFA Institute Member or CFA Candidate
The readings will instruct you on procedures designed to prevent violations and conduct yourself appropriately in situations involving your professional integrity.
Introduction to the Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS)
The Global Investment Performance Standards are voluntary ethical guidelines applied to investment performance reporting and designed by CFA Institute (CFAI) in partnership with GIPS Standards sponsors and industry experts. Investment firms and asset owners abide by GIPS as a commitment to transparency for investors.
This reading introduces GIPS standards and explains the reasoning behind their creation. You will become familiar with the benefits of industry-wide standards and their elevation of the community as a whole.
Ethics Application
This course prioritizes Company Analysis: Past and Present, equipping you to articulate elements in a research report, determine a company’s business model, and evaluate revenue factors such as pricing power. It also guides the assessment of operating profitability, working capital efficiency, and insights into financial decision-making regarding capital investments and structure.
Ethics Application
This reading allows you to exercise your newly acquired ethics thinking. You will apply your CFAI Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct knowledge to a series of real-world scenarios. After selecting an answer, the reading presents the correct response and the rationale behind it.
CFA Ethics Level 1 Sample Questions and Answers
These sample questions are typical of the probing multiple-choice questions on the L1 exam. During the exam, you have about 90 seconds to read and answer each question, carefully designed to test knowledge from the CFA curriculum. UWorld’s question bank is built to expose you to exam-like questions and illustrate and explain the concepts tested thoroughly.
If a professional organization has standards of conduct in addition to its code of ethics, the purpose of the standards is most likely to describe:
- shared principles.
- laws and regulations.
- acceptable behaviors.
Instruments for compliance with professional ethics
Instrument | Owner | Describes |
---|---|---|
Code of ethics | Professional organization | Shared principles |
Standards of conduct | Professional organization | Minimally acceptable behavior |
Laws and regulations | Government | Legal limits of behavior |
A code of ethics is a professional organization’s statement of shared principles. Standards of conduct provide a guide to practicing the principles outlined in the code of ethics. Standards of conduct also clarify the minimally acceptable behaviors required to conform to the code of ethics. Although not addressed directly in standards of conduct, adherence to civil laws and regulations may be the minimally acceptable behavior in some cases.
Standards of conduct may be principle-based or rule-based. Principle-based standards are universally applicable to members of the profession and are based on the principles outlined in the code of ethics. Rule-based standards, while also relating to the principles in the code of ethics, are usually more narrowly applicable and specific to certain members or scenarios that may arise.
A code of ethics may or may not be accompanied by standards of conduct whereas standards of conduct exist only to enhance their associated code of ethics. CFA Institute has adopted both a code of ethics and standards of conduct (the “Code and Standards”); CFA charterholders and candidates are expected to know and comply with both.
(Choice A) Standards of conduct are used to describe minimally acceptable behaviors or practices, given the shared principles of the code of ethics. The code of ethics describes the shared principles.
(Choice B) Standards of conduct do not describe civil laws and regulations.
Things to remember:
Standards of conduct are used to clarify the minimally acceptable behaviors required to conform to the shared principles stated in a code of ethics; they do not address applicable civil laws and regulations.
Zhao Fen, CFA, is an independent investor. She holds a large position of Formula Industries, a lightly traded stock with low liquidity, in one of her two personal accounts. If Zhao wishes to exit the position, which of the following would most likely violate the Standards?
- Using an intermediary to sell the position outside of the market to avoid price impacts.
- Selling her holdings as one position, which would likely cause a large drop in the price.
- Trading the stock between personal accounts to attract interest from other market participants.
“Members and Candidates must not engage in practices that distort prices or artificially inflate trading volume with the intent to mislead market participants.”
Standard II(B) Market Manipulation prohibits activities by Members or Candidates that deceive market participants by distorting securities prices or volumes. Manipulation can occur through:
- information-based activities (eg, issuing false or misleading information) and/or
- transaction-based activities (eg, exaggerated trading between two accounts).
The Standard does not prevent the use of legitimate trading strategies, even if they cause price movements or are designed to purposefully limit the impact on the market. The key element in determining whether the Standard is violated is intent: if the strategy is intended to deceive investors, it violates the Standard.
In this scenario, if Zhao Fen traded Formula Industries stock between her personal accounts, it would give market participants a false impression of higher trading volume since the trading is not done between unique market participants. Deceiving participants through transaction-based manipulation violates the Standard.
(Choice A) Using an intermediary (eg, block house) to sell the position outside the market or break the order into smaller batches is a legitimate trading strategy. This practice aims to reduce a sale’s impact on the market, but the resulting trades are done with other market participants and therefore do not violate the Standard.
(Choice B) While selling all the holdings in one position might drive down the price, Zhao may do so without intending to manipulate market participants; therefore, it is not the action most likely to violate the Standard. The Standards do not require Members or Candidates to disadvantage themselves to uphold market integrity, so this strategy can be used if cash is needed quickly.
Things to remember:
Standard II(B) prohibits activities by Members or Candidates that deceive market participants to distort securities prices or volumes. The Standard allows the use of legitimate trading strategies, even if they impact security prices. The key element in determining whether the Standard is violated is intent.
Letitia Armando, CFA, works for a global investment bank. She is transferred to an office in an emerging market country. The local office staff suggest that Armando pay an unofficial “administrative fee” to local regulatory officials in return for ensuring that the bank receives approval on new public offerings. Armando researches local law and finds that it does not prohibit such payments and that, in fact, it is the accepted local practice. If Armando pays the officials, will she most likely violate Standard I: Professionalism?
- No, since the payments are not illegal
- No, since the standard requires compliance with local law
- Yes, since the payments compromise the officials’ objectivity
Standard I of the CFA Institute Code and Standards focuses on four subsections of professional conduct: (A) Knowledge of the Law; (B) Independence and Objectivity; (C) Misrepresentation; and (D) Misconduct. Standard I(A) Knowledge of the Law requires members and candidates to know local law and the Code and Standards and to follow whichever is stricter.
“Members and Candidates must understand and comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations (including the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct) of any government, regulatory organization, licensing agency, or professional association governing their professional activities. In the event of conflict, Members and Candidates must comply with the more strict law, rule, or regulation. Members and Candidates must not knowingly participate or assist in and must dissociate from any violation of such laws, rules, or regulations.”
In this case, the payments do not violate local laws, but the Code and Standards prescribe a more restrictive policy in Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity. Standard I(B) requires members and candidates to avoid any actions that would compromise the independence and objectivity of an investment professional, including a regulatory official.
“Members and Candidates must use reasonable care and judgment to achieve and maintain independence and objectivity in their professional activities. Members and Candidates must not offer, solicit, or accept any gift, benefit, compensation, or consideration that reasonably could be expected to compromise their own or another’s independence and objectivity.”
Since these payments are intended to compromise the independence and objectivity of regulatory officials, by ensuring regulatory approval, making such payments is a violation of Standard I(B). Since the Code and Standards prohibit such payments and are stricter than local law, the payments also violate Standard I(A).
(Choices A and B) Although the payments are not illegal and comply with local law, Armando also needs to comply with CFA Institute standards since they are stricter in this case. She would violate Standard I(B)—and therefore also Standard I(A)—by making these payments.
Things to remember:
Standard I(A) requires members and candidates to follow local law or CFA Institute Code and Standards, whichever is stricter. An action that is not prohibited under local law may still violate the Code and Standards. Actions that would compromise the independence and objectivity of an investment professional violate Standard I(B).
What to Expect in CFA Level 2 Ethics
CFA Level 2 Ethics is one of the most heavily weighted topics on the exam at 10-15%. The topic material reiterates about 80% of the material found in the CFA Level 1 Ethics. Level 2 introduces the item set format for the entire exam, including Ethics. This form of testing ensures that you have a deeper understanding of the material.
Exam Weighting
The CFA Level 2 Ethics topic has an exam weighting of 10-15%, such that approximately 8-12 of the 88 CFA Level 2 exam questions or 2-3 item sets focus on this topic.
No. of Learning Modules | No. of Formulas |
---|---|
3 | 0 |
Level 2 Ethics 2025 Syllabus, Readings, and Changes
No. of Learning Modules – 3 | No. of LOS – 6 | |
---|---|---|
Summary
Dives deeper into CFAI Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct and how you can use these codes and standards to resolve ethical conflicts in the investment profession. You will confront numerous case applications. |
Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct
This reading dives deeper into the nuances of the Standards of Practice Handbook presented in the analog CFA Level 1 Ethics chapter. You will study the 6 components of the Code of Ethics and the 7 Standards of Professional Conduct.
Guidance for Standards I-VII
You must demonstrate their knowledge of the CFAI Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct through its application. The 7 standards were presented in a similar reading for Level 1. The reading recommends various procedures that you will use to prevent code and standard violations and best practices from upholding them.
Application of the Code and Standards: Level 2
Like the related reading in CFA Level 1 Ethics, this reading will show how to apply the CFAI Codes and Standards to various real-world situations. You will learn about the ethical decision-making process and readily identify where particular Codes and Standards are considered relevant.
CFA Ethics Level 2 Sample Questions and Answers
These sample questions here are typical of the L2 exam’s complexity and depth – formatted as item sets, with a vignette to deliver a scenario that tests the CFA L2 curriculum. On the actual exam, each vignette applies to 4 questions. We’ve provided a few extra questions for you to practice with. Be sure to review the illustrated answer explanations we’ve provided for each question. UWorld’s QBank is designed to expose you to exam-like questions and explain the concepts tested thoroughly.
Do Universal’s personal transaction disclosure policies comply with CFA Institute’s required and recommended procedures?
- No.
- Yes, since no disclosure is required.
- Yes, since they meet the minimum disclosure requirements.
“Investment transactions for clients and employers must have priority over investment transactions in which a Member or Candidate is the beneficial owner.”
Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions requires Members and Candidates to place clients’ and employers’ financial interests before their own when conducting investment transactions and recommends avoiding even the appearance of conflicts of interest.
Firms should have policies and procedures to address such issues. Members and Candidates should fully and publicly disclose their firm’s policy regarding personal securities transactions. If such a policy is established, CFA Institute requires that it be disclosed with some level of detail, not simply in general, nondescript (“boilerplate”) language, as was the case in this scenario.
Although each firm should develop specific provisions applicable to its circumstances, publicly available details of firm policies must be informative and convey the essence of full and complete disclosure to alleviate the public’s concern regarding the potential for conflicts of interest (Choices B and C).
Things to remember:
A firm’s policy on personal investing must be disclosed with some level of detail, as required by CFA Institute, and cannot be written in general, nondescript language. Although each firm should develop specific provisions, the guiding principle is that a complete disclosure of the policy must be conveyed to alleviate the public’s concern regarding the potential for conflicts of interest.
Which of Universal’s procedures for personal investing by employees is inconsistent with CFA Institute’s required and recommended procedures?
- There is no preclearance requirement.
- Transaction and holdings disclosures are not frequent enough.
- The blackout period is insufficient to prevent front-running of client trades.
“Investment transactions for clients and employers must have priority over investment transactions in which a Member or Candidate is the beneficial owner.”
Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions stipulates that once a firm has established a policy on personal investing, specific reporting of personal holdings and securities transactions of investment personnel is required to ensure the policy is enforced. Since the policy’s overriding goal is to address client concerns regarding personal securities transactions and any conflicts of interest for the firm’s employees, enforcement procedures must also be established.
Key elements of the enforcement requirements include:
- Initial disclosure of holdings in which an employee has beneficial ownership (eg, for self, trust, spouse)
- Holdings disclosure, at least annually
- Duplicate transaction confirmations and periodic statements provided to the employer
- Preclearance procedures before the employee can trade
(Choice B) Standard VI(B) stipulates that duplicate transaction confirmations and periodic statements be provided, but it does not specify how frequently. Transaction confirmations should be done at the time of trade to ensure adequate supervision of activity, but quarterly holdings disclosure is adequate and common in most circumstances.
(Choice C) A blackout period is a recommended (not required) policy, and each firm has discretion regarding the period’s duration. Although the minimum period is not specified, a blackout of two days before and after a client trade is likely adequate to minimize market impact and prevent a conflict of interest and/or front-running of client trades.
Things to remember:
The key requirements of Standard VI(B) for investment personnel include trade preclearance and reporting personal holdings and securities transactions.
According to Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions, when Martin bought shares of Vent, he most likely:
- violated the Standards.
- did not violate the Standards since the trade was outside the blackout period.
- did not violate the Standards since the transaction was in a different market than client transactions.
“Investment transactions for clients and employers must have priority over investment transactions in which a Member or Candidate is the beneficial owner.”
Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions requires Members and Candidates to place clients’ and employers’ financial interests before their own when conducting investment transactions. However, it is not uncommon for a Member or Candidate to transact in the same investments as clients, or even alongside clients.
Best practice is for the firm to create policies and procedures (eg, preclearance, duplicate confirmations) that avoid not only actual conflicts of interest but the appearance of conflicts of interest. Client transactions must always take precedence over personal or firm transactions.
In this instance, by recommending and then immediately purchasing shares before the firm had made an investment decision, Martin violated the Standard. Members and Candidates should trade on a recommendation they have made only after the firm has had the opportunity to act on that recommendation; by trading immediately, Martin violated the Standard. He should have waited for a decision to be made before purchasing shares for himself and thereby allowed client transactions to have priority.
(Choice B) Although Martin’s transaction was outside the blackout period, he put his own interest above the clients’ and therefore violated the Standard.
(Choice C) Shares that are dually listed in different markets represent the same ownership of a company and are often fungible (ie, directly exchangeable). Thus, the securities are the same and the location of the ownership or transaction is not relevant.
Things to remember:
A Member’s or Candidate’s trade does not violate Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions provided the trade does not disadvantage a client, and the Member or Candidate adheres to all applicable regulatory requirements and does not benefit from client transactions.
Latest Changes in the Level 3 Curriculum
For the 2025 CFA Program Level III, CFA Institute has introduced substantial enhancements and expansions, marking one of the most significant developments since the program’s inception. This year features the debut of specialized pathways in Private Wealth, Private Markets, and Portfolio Management, allowing you to tailor your learning to align closely with your career aspirations. Each pathway builds on a robust common core, enriched with specialized content designed to deepen expertise in your chosen area. As you delve into these new pathways, detailed descriptions of each can be found seamlessly integrated within our Level 3 curriculum topic outline guide.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How can I study Ethics for CFA?
Once you’ve mastered the Standards, discussing Ethics is a natural next step. Apply the 7 Standards to see if 1 of them is being broken.
How do I practice CFA Ethics questions?
Do the CFA’s End Of Chapter (EOC) questions along with any questions in the EcoSystem. Beyond that, we highly recommend going through UWorld’s Learning QBank, which is known for intuitively explaining Ethics to raise test scores.
What is the difference between Professional Standards and Professional Ethics?
Whatever the level of the CFA program, Ethics is a difficult subject. It should not be mistaken with common sense or being a “good” person, as there are numerous particular instances in finance that necessitate a much more in-depth understanding.
Why do I need to study Ethics?
Remember that the exam is not testing your personal behavior but your ability to apply the Standards as a member of the investment profession. The ethical decisions that you make as a Charterholder may not be so clear and easy.